Pop Culture Icons
postitas: fawin321 - 08.01.2021, , loetud: 30x
Pop culture consumption is based on popular taste or things individuals enjoy for entertainment or other purposes. It basically dwells on common and valuable subjects concerning people. Pop culture is also associated with morality and ethics, either to influence or judge. It can suggest to the society behaviors that are moral and good, or unethical and immoral. Having understood the concept of pop culture, it is easy to identify the pop culture icons that are good examples of morality to the public. Likewise, it becomes easier to identify those that are horrible examples of morality. Barry in his book, “Rhetorical Dimensions of Popular Culture,” illustrate that pop culture should be regarded as sources for creating meaning of common social matters and public perception of them. If you need to create awsome speech you can buy powerpoint presentation from professionals at essaytresures.com.
Brainstorming of icons like Oprah Winfrey, Princess Diana, Bugs Bunny, Bill Clinton, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, Martin Luther Jr., Kermit/Miss Piggy, Katherine Hepburn, Muhammad Ali, Bill Gates, and many more; morality come to picture. These are folks that have significantly impacted and inspired American society. They give the pop culture ethical aspects as per morality standards within the society are expected. However, a coin has two sides; as people celebrate pop culture heroes (the good side) Americans cannot forget to brainstorm about the ugly side. Icons like Osama Bin Laden and other of like minded are viewed as immorality perpetuated since their intentions are to cause havoc to society and disrupt the mutual coexistence between nations. Immorality and morality of culture basically refer to accepted and condemned behaviors within a community. However, actions taken to those perpetrating unethical activities have been debated many a times.
Mark’s Article Morality Issues
This is evident in Mark White article, Should Batman Kill the Joker, where joker’s fate is dangling since Batman does not want to turn into what he is not, even though Joker keeps on robbing innocent citizens their lives. In the essay, Batman symbolizes the pop icon representing morality within the community so as to make sure that people are safe (Romagnoli 28). He is seen to be protecting the citizen from harms that could be done by Joker and like minded. However, he faces challenges due to moral values since he cannot just kill Joker even though he can. The moral guidance he portrays is that two wrongs do not make a right; by killing joker he will be turning out as a killer like him (joker). Morality within a society guides the actions of all and gives regulation to follow. Like the current struggle with terrorist cases, torture is not permitted yet what they do is beyond conceptualization. The joker represents the pop icon that is a horrible example to the society because of his actions. He is causing havoc to citizens. However, morality demands that he be dealt with in a moral manner.
Montgomery's Real Argument
Montgomery’s essay Island of Plenty applies the biblical orientation of the Garden of Eden as a comparison to the present universe. He also uses an immense deal of logic to nosh off the common anxieties of the common person, which creates his arguments regarding how the U.S. ought not share resources with the nations in need. The Garden of Eden, a gorgeous self-sustaining planet with no fear and no contamination, just a utopia created and daydreamed about in the early testament. Montgomery fortifies his argument concerning the problems of over population by utilizing the biblical Eden as an application of imagery. After his unkind opening subsection on how the universe should let those who go hungry die, he brings up the picture of Eden and how ideal it was before Adam took control and ignored Gods plan for the universe (Barbara 196). Well in present time, man have transformed the earth extremely creating a train destruction of what was once so untainted and beautiful. He suggests here that over population is a type of pollution, though this is an uncommon concept in most opinion, and backs up his concepts with social creation concepts and other facts that can simply be applied as blocks in the creation of his argument. Montgomery brings a vast deal of logic to generate a stronger argument. He discusses how resources are scarce and the more population there are in this earth, the more the struggle there will be. His inference is that the United States, by assisting undeveloped and poor countries, are just barely keeping them living enough to reproduce more that results in more people living an unhappy existence.
The concept of Montgomery is that United States be independent before assisting the rest of the world (Barbara 196). Those who can not give should not procreate, which will consequence in the death of the surplus people and ultimately leads to balance because their will be more to give. In addition, Montgomery provides some interest in his melancholic, yet miserably logical theory, by bringing to the awareness of his readers how it will progress the economy. The real argument of Montgomery is that the earth is overpopulated and reproduction must be discontinued to enable current population to enjoy the resources adequately. The argument based on resources verses the population; most of the natural resources are non-renewable and as the population grows over exploitation of these resources is inevitable. Control on population would make the earth a better place. On this concept, he compares the present world with the bible Garden of Eden and gives a clear picture of where the world is headed.